![“Under 18 years old for models” “Extreme poses and swimsuits” Confirmation of pointing out “Pool photo session” at Saitama Prefectural Park canceled due to venue reasons … Banned uniformly: J-CAST News[Full text]](https://japan.postsen.com/content/uploads/2023/06/09/60ec487e0d.jpg)
A swimsuit photo session, which was scheduled to be held at a prefectural park in Saitama Prefecture, was canceled due to circumstances at the venue. In response to the interview, the Saitama Prefectural Parks and Green Space Association, the designated manager, revealed on June 9, 2023 that it was a policy to uniformly prohibit swimsuit photo sessions in prefectural parks.
-
“Pool photo session” canceled due to venue circumstances (picture is an image)
“Judged to be contrary to public order and morals”
The “Fresh photo session” scheduled to be held at Kawagoe Water Park on the 10th and “Miss Young Animal 2023” scheduled to be held at Shirakobato Water Park have been cancelled. Each event management announced on Twitter on the 8th. Both are “pool photo sessions” and both have been canceled due to the venue.
In response to an interview, the Saitama Prefectural Parks and Green Spaces Association said it made the decision after receiving an email from a prefectural citizen.
“I received an email from a prefectural citizen regarding the swimsuit photo session scheduled to be held at Shirakobato Water Park, and said that the models included women under the age of 18, and that extreme poses and costumes could be seen.”
The association checked Twitter and other sources on the Internet and determined that the content of the email was true.
“When the park issues permission to use the park, we tell them that extreme poses and extreme swimsuits are not allowed, but since this has not been observed, we have determined that it is against public order and morals, and have issued a statement to the organizers. I have decided not to allow the use of the facility.”
In addition, it was decided that it would be difficult for the organizer to control the participants in the swimsuit photo session, so it was decided to prohibit it uniformly. It was decided on the 8th and requested the organizers to cancel.
The facility usage fee was supposed to be received at a later date, so there was no refund. Compensation for damages caused by the cancellation of the event will be handled appropriately after consultation with the organizers and corporate lawyers.
The Communist Party Saitama Prefectural Assembly members asked the prefecture to cancel the “swimsuit photo session”
Regarding the swimsuit photo session, on the 8th, the Japan Communist Party Saitama Prefectural Committee Gender Equality Committee and the Japanese Communist Party Saitama Prefectural Assembly members requested Saitama Prefecture to cancel. According to the official website of the Saitama Prefectural Assembly members of the Japanese Communist Party, the rental of Shirakoba and Water Park for swimsuit photo sessions has been canceled, the implementation status of swimsuit photo sessions using prefectural facilities has been investigated, and the rental standards of prefectural facilities have been reviewed. is offering.
Did this request affect your decision? The association says, “There was no direct contact with the association.”
“The Communist Party had made a request to the prefecture. The prefecture also asked if the swimsuit photo session could be canceled, but it was not because of the Communist Party, but as a comprehensive decision by the prefecture. I received”
The Saitama Prefectural Parks and Stadiums Division expressed a similar view in response to the interview.
“We didn’t respond because there was a request from the Communist Party, but because there were reports that there were cases in the past few days that violated the conditions of permission to rent.”
There are cases where the rules are not followed, such as photos of models wearing micro-bikini or similar revealing swimsuits, and photos of people posing in extreme poses, posted by event participants on SNS. It is said that there was.
The association explains that the final decision on facility rental is made by the association.
“The decision was not made solely based on the opinion of the prefecture, but based on an understanding of past facts and whether or not it violates public order and morals, which is a condition for permission, and made a comprehensive decision.”
Models who were scheduled to appear lament the cancellation
Ina Aoneko, who was scheduled to appear in the fresh photo session, appealed on Twitter, “Our gravure work has been taken away, please don’t take away our work.”
Junko Edakubo, who appeared in a swimsuit photo session at another event in the past, also complained as follows.
“We gravure idols are not forced to appear in pool photo sessions as sexual harassment. We wear swimsuits because we like them, and we appear in photo sessions because we like them. What’s wrong with wearing swimsuits in the pool? Is it?”
The event was held on a chartered basis with permission from the facility, and he said that he complied with regulations, saying, “Please don’t take away our favorite jobs.”
In response to these voices, the association expressed the view that “what the association does is to deal with the organizer,” and that the organizer is responsible for dealing with the performers.
(Added at 17:42 on June 9) Part of the text has been corrected.
Tags: years models Extreme poses swimsuits Confirmation pointing Pool photo session Saitama Prefectural Park canceled due venue reasons Banned uniformly JCAST NewsFull text
-
